Cold War Leaders: Truman vs Stalin
Focus
- “impact” of leaders on the “course” and “development” of the the cold war"
- policiesだけでなく、しっかりrole/impactにつなげるの大事
Introduction
- Truman, president from 1945 to 1953
- after Roosevelt, who was more appeasing to Stalin
- Stalin, leader from 1924-53
- leaders when the world changed from multipolar to bipolar world. (Weakened Europe after WW2)
- They were two competing systems, each convinced of their own rectitude and of the expansionist plans of the other.
- Each saw others as threat
- from the start, 1918 American intervention in Russia
- Truman, president from 1945 to 1953
Both aimed to create their sphere of influence in Europe
- NATO, Warsaw Pact
- Both Stalin and Truman pursued ideological confrontation
- Truman Doctrine: Policy of proactive containment against Soviet sphere of influence, instead of Isolationism before
- ‘two camps’ doctrine: World divided to “imperialistic” led by US, and “democratic” led by USSR, artists and intelligentsias had to follow this perspective
- Divided Europe
Both intervened in Asia to
- multipolar to bipolar
Different Tactics
General Policies
- Baruch plan by the US, to keep American monopoly
- sims
- Both Stalin and Truman pursued ideological confrontation
- Truman Doctrine: Policy of proactive containment against Soviet sphere of influence, instead of Isolationism before
- ‘two camps’ doctrine: World divided to “imperialistic” led by US, and “democratic” led by USSR, artists and intelligentsias had to follow this perspective
- Both used their military capability to confront the other.
- Both engaged in an arms race.
- Both pursued ‘containment’ of the other in Europe and other regions.
- Both Stalin and Truman pursued ideological confrontation
- difs
- Different apporach of containment
- Truman relied initially on the ability to threaten the use of nuclear weapons to contain the Soviets
- TODO: Example
- Stalin more relied on conventional forces.
- TODO: Data
- Truman relied initially on the ability to threaten the use of nuclear weapons to contain the Soviets
- Different apporach of containment
Regional Policies (Asia)
- Dropped 2 A-bombs to Japan, to alert the Russians the US force
- sim/difs of those general policies are reflected to the developemnt of the cold war in different regions, ex Asia
- sims
- Both intervened in Asia to establish spheres of influence.
- Korean War:
- Vietnam:
- Truman sent military advisors
- dif
- Korean War
- Korean War:
- Vietnam
Regional Policies (Europe)
- NATO: military backup between US and Western Europe
- Reasons: Safety for US, Increase of influence
- Revisionist Interpretation: Created from hostility to Stalin
- Warsaw Pact:
- Revisionist Interpretation: Created to protect themselves from NATO
- sims
- Both focused on Germany as a key strategic territory.
- Both broke the agreements made at Yalta and Potsdam.
- difs
- approach
- Truman used the economic strength of the USA to gain political influence in Western Europe;
- Stalin used conventional military strength to gain political control in Eastern Europe.
- economic
- Truman responded to Western Europeans, particularly the British, asking for economic assistance (that is, Marshall Aid)
- Eastern Europeans were forced by Stalin to join COMECON.
- Truman broke agreements on Germany economically speaking, with the introduction of a new currency into the western sectors, whereas Stalin broke the political agreements.
- Stalin
- unfair elections, broke yalta
- Truman
- west germany, broke yalta
- unification of Us, British, French territories, Bizonia
- new constitution (means new nation)
- currency
- west germany, broke yalta
- Stalin
- approach
- NATO: military backup between US and Western Europe
Claim / Conclusion
- They have minor differences on their apporaches, but their aim were the same.
- They both attempted to increase their influence and contain the others, using policital, economic and militaristic power.
- Thus, they had large role on ending the Grand Alliance and starting the confrontation
Note
- TrumanとStalinの被ってる時期をめいんにはなすべき
- 例えばwarsaw pactはtrumanいなかったから、メインには話さない方が良いかも
- ただ、show contextするために軽く言及した方が良さそう
- 範囲外も軽く触れることで、show contextする
- TrumanとStalinの被ってる時期をめいんにはなすべき
Sources
- Pearson Textbook p242
- QUotesもある
- Cold War and Americas
- 最初のところ、Truman and the Cold War
- これ使えばpaper 3 (hl) contentも入るので良い
- https://eduzaurus.com/free-essay-samples/a-comparative-study-between-the-roles-of-truman-and-stalin-in-the-development-of-the-cold-war/
- https://matteoaprilehistory.weebly.com/truman-and-stalin%20https://eduzaurus.com/free-essay-samples/a-comparative-study-between-the-roles-of-truman-and-stalin-in-the-development-of-the-cold-war/-essay.html
- Pearson Textbook p242
https://docs.google.com/document/d/19cLwhmKd9wtAH180EgvoqnPJBoxpqvEJfuWgdiGhQuI/edit
- 授業で作った表
? Compare and contrast the roles of two Cold war leaders from different regions in the development of the Cold War.
? Analyse the roles of two Cold war leaders from different regions in the development of the Cold War.
- analyseとかdiscussの可能性もある